From Wikimedia Commons: The Synagogue in Frankfurt am Main (Max Beckmann, 1919) 

The resurgence of antisemitism across Europe's historic urban centers raises a fundamental and urgent question: Is there any future for the Jews on this continent? The answer, deeply intertwined with both historical trauma and contemporary crises, points towards a grim negative. Western Europe, the cradle of Renaissance and Enlightenment ideals, now faces a profound civilizational regression. Institutional destabilization is driven in large part by a radicalized Islamic ideology that directly challenges the continent's cultural foundations.

Over the past half-century, mass immigration from Muslim-majority nations has transformed the demographic landscape, birthing enclaves where Sharia whispers louder than secular law. Under cover of multiculturalism, this is conquest by stealth, a demographic jihad that exploits the very freedoms that it seeks to dismantle. The Jews, ever the canary in the coal mine of civilization, are suffocating first in this toxic atmosphere. Their plight foretells a grim fate not only for themselves but also for the entire Judeo-Christian heritage of Europe. Antisemitism counts as prophecy.

Consider the streets of Paris, London, Berlin, and Amsterdam—once vibrant arteries of cosmopolitan

A recent article in City Journal by Heather MacDonald argued that street homelessness is fundamentally an addiction and mental health crisis disguised as a housing shortage.

I've been saying the same thing for a number of years. The romance of the poor homeless on city sidewalks being there because of capitalism, unfair equity practices, poverty, or racism is over. Yet the Left continues to pursue this romantic fiction, despite it being a lie.

Once, there was an element of truth to this myth. The phrase, "Lift them up!" was a favorite among Philadelphia homeless activists.

The truly homeless — people not addicted to drugs who want to get off the streets as soon as possible — are able to obtain housing and move on. But the men and women who make the streets their home, cannot be said to be "homeless." They are vagrants, 100% of them victims of addiction. Many are superficially "nice" people who panhandle, shoplift, and even rob their fellow vagrants for one reason only: to get money for drugs.

When chronic vagrants are offered housing, they refuse it. They cannot manage the housing application process because their addiction to Xylazine (or tranq), mixed with Fentanyl, keeps them unconscious

I find time-lapse photography fascinating. One of my favorite examples is when someone in the far north points a camera at the North Star during winter and leaves it there overnight. The result is typically an image of silhouetted trees surrounding an array of circles made by the stars traveling across the sky as the Earth spins. Although that picture captures reality, there's no moment when you could ever actually see it simply by looking up. It doesn't actually exist as a single moment; it's only by seeing the time-lapse that you can perceive it.

A more consequential example, although I'm not sure it technically meets the definition of time-lapse, is when a parent takes an image of a child every day, or every Monday, for a series of years and then puts the images together so that they run in sequence. While each individual image might tell a story—"That was Janie at 12, when she first got her braces," or "That was Timothy at 8, when he decided to cut his own hair"—taken in aggregate, the sequence tells a completely different story, as a daughter grows from a scared kindergartner to a smiling college graduate in minutes.

The funny thing

In revealing the commonalities of the Reds and the Greens in the Red-Green Axis, we have elucidated their shared goals of violence, wealth redistribution, and inequality before the law. Here we explore their binary worldview.

Both Islamic political systems, as developed in classical jurisprudence, and Marxist-Leninist communism organize the world into a permanent binary division. One domain is the legitimate, correctly ordered sphere; the other is the external sphere that remains incomplete, illegitimate, or hostile until it is transformed or subordinated.

This division is not a temporary phase or a pragmatic map of power; it is a structural feature that generates a standing external mission, an ongoing obligation toward the outsider domain. The parallel is practical and political, not rhetorical.

Both systems reject a world of permanently equal, mutually recognizing sovereigns under neutral international law. Instead, they treat the external realm as the field of unfinished work, and both built durable institutions to prosecute it.

In classical Islamic political theory, the world is binarily divided into dar al-Islam, the domain in which Islamic rule and law prevail, and dar al-harb (harb: "war"), the domain of war or unbelief. The terms are juristic rather than directly Quranic, but

President Trump is a master deal-maker. Just ask him. And his balance sheet suggests he's right. But his actions toward Iran have a major problem. There is no deal to be made. Let's consider the situation.

In making a deal, both sides must gain something. Typically, neither side gets everything it wants.

If you are selling your house, you put it on the market at a price higher than what you are willing to accept. An offer comes in below that number, and at that point you start negotiation. There are many variations, but ultimately a deal will usually include a price lower than you had hoped for. The buyer will pay more than he wished to spend, but ultimately, there's middle ground on which you can agree. Or there may be no deal, and the whole dance starts again with a different prospective buyer.

The basic issue in this deal-making is that both parties have related interests, and each is willing to give up a bit to get most of what is desired. Bookmark that idea.

This is where Donald Trump is operating under a delusion. He thinks that the mullahs and IRGC actually want peace where their people will prosper. The

There is a pattern that repeats with disturbing regularity: when left-wing or socialist policies dominate power, crises not only arrive — they worsen, are managed through ideology, and end up costing lives, prosperity, and social cohesion. This is not an accident. It is the result of a worldview that prioritizes narrative, social engineering, and political control over effectiveness, prevention, and reality. The 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, uncontrolled mass immigration, and energy failures are clear examples. The United States is not immune: what Europe and Spain have suffered with particular intensity offers a direct warning for America.

The 2008 crisis was global, originating in the American financial system, but its effects multiplied wherever uncontrolled public spending, excessive state intervention, and the denial of risks had prepared the ground. In Europe, left-wing governments denied the evidence until unemployment skyrocketed and families lost their homes. In the United States, the subsequent recovery under various administrations showed that policies of massive stimulus and heavy regulation can prolong suffering when not combined with fiscal discipline and real growth. The lesson is simple: when the left confuses redistribution with wealth creation, the result is more poverty and desperation.

The pandemic offered an even more revealing

The French government reported a threatening budget deficit on Tuesday morning. According to current calculations, the budget deficit in the first half of the year is significantly higher than originally planned. The country is trapped in a debt spiral with no apparent way out.

Tuesday marked another low point for European fiscal stability. France, a cornerstone of the euro system, confirmed once again that it remains a leading candidate and potential trigger for a future euro financial crisis.

According to the French Ministry of Finance, the deficit of the French central government amounted to around €107 billion by the end of June. These are staggering figures -- a deficit that is 14.4 percent higher than originally planned by the government.

Unless the government builds a fiscal firewall and no economic miracle occurs, the central government deficit could rise to around six percent this year. Not included are the gaps in the social security system, municipalities and regions, which account for an additional significant share of France's overall deficit. It is possible that the second-largest economy in the European Union will end the year with an overall government deficit of around eight percent.

All budget plans would therefore become obsolete. Last year, the

Who knew golfing, skydiving, and scuba diving were a "white" thing?

NBC seems to think they are in their piece "Scuba, skydiving and golf: Black adults embrace sports that defy stereotypes and bring joy."

Those sports and others like them (tennis, skating, gymnastics) always struck me as a disposable income thing not a race thing, requiring as they do the purchase of expensive lessons and/or expensive equipment and/or expensive travel/venue time. Cash and sheer merit — never race — were always what I thought about when I thought about who participates or excels in these sports.

Evidently not NBC News. NBC wrote the entire piece on the premise that these sports "were once inaccessible" to blacks but are just now becoming accessible because, as one "expert" interviewed accidentally admitted, blacks are now "giving themselves" permission to pursue them.

The piece then quickly moved along, but that single admission early on kinda blew the narrative and begged the question: If these sports are something blacks can now freely give themselves, then how is it whitey's fault? Why then even bring up the "once inaccessible" pre-civil rights era unless it's just to cast a long victim/oppressor shadow?

NBC never proffered a single person who'd

There is a frustrating contradiction when it comes to the way public information is assessed for factual truth.  For decades, prominent news organizations have steadily lost credibility.  Fewer Americans than ever believe what The New York Times, CNN, NPR, or even the AP publishes as the "objective" record of current events.  At the same time, however, alternative, competing descriptions of current events are almost entirely ignored.  No matter how compelling or factually sourced a story might be, it is largely disregarded until mainstream corporate news institutions are willing to recognize its validity.

This annoying state of affairs was highlighted last week after Dr. Anthony Fauci refused to testify before the Senate.  Although the man holds one of Joe Biden's get-out-of-jail-free autopen pardons, Fauci cowardly asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination more than a hundred times.  With a general pardon in hand that presumably allows him to get away with past acts of mass murder, he could put himself in legal jeopardy only by not telling the truth while under oath at the hearing.  So long as Fauci avoided newly committing perjury, there was no risk to his liberty.  The fact that he nevertheless remained mum