Some politically charged words become part of our common vocabulary almost overnight.  "Globalism" is a timely example.  Ten or fifteen years ago, calling someone a "globalist" didn't have much effect.  Today, it is well understood as a pejorative that highlights someone's allegiance to international institutions over those created within a nation state.

Although the term has been used in various academic circles for more than a century, it didn't become part of our common political parlance until anti-Establishment conservatives in the United States and Europe found it a useful taxonomic description of their ideological opponents.  In hindsight, it is surprising how long the word "globalism" remained dormant and hidden away in the context of political speech and debate.  

During the Cold War, however, the world was divided between the Soviet Union and the United States, between communism and freedom, between closed economies and open markets.  To the extent that nationalism and globalism were distinguished from each other, academics and political leaders did so under the umbrella of the Cold War contest between East and West to gobble up as many nation states as possible.  Both sides embraced a "domino theory" of geopolitics in which partisans fought for global domination, one nation at a time.

There was, however, an

The grocery store may be the least forgiving classroom in which to teach political economy. The shelves do not care about ideology. The checkout scanner does not respond to applause lines. A gallon of milk does not know whether it was purchased in a capitalist marketplace or a municipal experiment in economic justice. It only knows what it cost to produce, transport, refrigerate, stock, and sell.

That is the inconvenient thing about economics. The numbers have no political affiliation. They simply arrive at the register.

That reality is the great problem for economic promises. They sound wonderful from a podium. They become considerably more complicated somewhere between the warehouse and the shopping cart.

More than a century ago, Americans laughed at a song built around an apparently contradictory declaration: "Yes, we have no bananas." The joke worked because the contradiction was obvious. In modern politics, the same joke has returned wearing a suit and carrying a spreadsheet.

Which brings us to one of the more fascinating promises emerging from the modern urban left: the government grocery store. The concept has obvious emotional appeal. Groceries are more expensive than they were in 2019. Families are frustrated. Everyone would like to see lower prices at

Islamic political systems and Marxist-Leninist communism both concentrate the authority to define correct doctrine, law, and policy in a closed directing elite. Ordinary members, let alone outsiders, lack standing to challenge the core claims. The result is an interpretive monopoly converting a comprehensive worldview into enforceable political control. This is not a secondary feature; it is a practical mechanism that secures ideological unity and suppresses competing claims to legitimacy.

In 833, the Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun ordered his judges and scholars to affirm that the Quran was created rather than eternal. The position came from the Mu'tazila, a rationalist theological school the caliph favored, which held that an eternal, uncreated Quran would stand as a second eternal being alongside God, violating His absolute oneness; traditionalists held instead that the Quran was God's own uncreated, inseparable speech. Those who refused faced dismissal, imprisonment, or the lash; al-Ma'mun's successor, the caliph al-Mu'tasim, had the traditionalist jurist Ahmad ibn Hanbal flogged for holding out.

The inquisition (the Mihna) ran for fifteen years before al-Mu'tasim's own son, the caliph al-Mutawakkil, ended it in 848 and restored the doctrine ibn Hanbal had defended. The lesson: a caliph could jail a scholar; he could not manufacture consensus. That

Abbie Hoffman was a colorful radical who led a group called the Yippies (derived from the name Youth International Party, founded in 1967) along with Jerry Rubin, who eventually left the radical movement of Yippie-dom to become a stockbroker. Abbie wrote a best-selling book titled Revolution for the Hell of It and was known for combining mockery and humor with his revolutionary fervor. On one occasion, he went to the gallery of the New York Stock Exchange and threw dollar bills from the visitors' balcony towards the floor of the Exchange. It was Abbie's way of mocking the money-focus of the NYSE and of American society.

Hoffman was a graduate of Brandeis University, where as an undergraduate, he took courses taught by a professorial savant by the name of Prof. Herbert Marcuse. Prof. Marcuse was one of a group of academics known as the Frankfurt School, who had migrated to the USA from Germany to escape the threat of Nazi persecution for their Marxist views. The Nazis also wanted strict government control of the economy, but private ownership of property was still allowed (however, ownership without having the final say over the use or disposal of that property or its

The political left has developed a remarkably simple response to almost every proposed election safeguard: Call it voter suppression.

Require identification at the polls? Voter suppression. Verify citizenship during registration? Voter suppression. Correct inaccurate registration records? A voter "purge." Adjust early-voting schedules? An assault on minority voters.

Different policies addressing different aspects of election administration are bundled together as parts of a national conspiracy to prevent minorities and Democrats from voting. Motive is assumed, discriminatory effect is declared, and accusation substitutes for evidence.

Citizenship is the foundation of our electoral system. Only American citizens may vote in federal elections. Investigators have identified serious anomalies in registration records nationwide. When government refuses reasonable verification or correction of demonstrably ineligible records, it leaves the basic qualification for voting inadequately enforced.

That principle is at the center of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, commonly called the SAVE America Act. The House-passed legislation would require documentary proof of citizenship when registering for federal elections and photo identification when voting.

Opponents often portray the bill as requiring every prospective voter to possess a passport. That is not what it says.

Acceptable documentation includes identification indicating citizenship; a valid U.S. passport; certain military records; photo identification showing a U.S.

Even with the unpredictability of evil actors in matters of war, a normalcy bias that developed after World War II has enveloped the minds of many policymakers involved with U.S. war-fighting strategy. American approaches to war for the last 70 years have been characterized by a normalcy bias that war conduct should be guided by the goal of reaching negotiated compromise outcomes rather than achieving victory and total defeat of the enemy.

Douglas MacArthur was relieved of duty as Commanding General of the U.S. Army Forces-Far East on April 11, 1951, almost a year into the Korean War. A week later, he gave his farewell address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress, a speech that was coined as the "No Substitute for Victory in War" speech. MacArthur's full quote on the essential importance of victory in that speech was, "War's very object is victory, not prolonged indecision. In war, there is no substitute for victory."

The current war with Iran that started on February 28, 2026, has not been conducted by the MacArthur maxim. Rather, similar to previous conflicts, it has been carried out through cycles of intense strikes -- ceasefires and lengthy "peace" negotiations -- truce breakdown

From Wikimedia Commons: Capitol at Washington D.C. (Augustus Kollner, 1839)

The federal architecture of the United States has always carried a burden heavier than mere utility. From the earliest days of the republic, the design of public buildings served as a deliberate assertion of national identity, a visible claim to civilized continuity with the deepest sources of Western political wisdom. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson understood this with clarity rare among statesmen.

Washington and Jefferson conceived the capital on the Potomac as a New Rome, a city whose forms would declare that the American experiment rested upon the enduring achievements of antiquity rather than upon the transient enthusiasms of the moment. The classical vocabulary that they employed—porticoes, colonnades, pediments, and domes of measured proportion—was no ornamental affectation. It constituted a public language of civic virtue, republican restraint, and institutional permanence.

Pierre Charles L'Enfant's plan for Washington embodied the ambition of his employers in urban form. A regular grid was overlaid with broad diagonal avenues that recalled the processional ways of Rome and the axial compositions of the European baroque. Public buildings were placed upon

The platform and policies of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) are presented as bold, modern solutions to the economic challenges facing Americans today. But in reality, their ideas are not new. Their central complaint—wealth inequality—has echoed through political movements for centuries. Their rallying cry for the "working man," their insistence that capitalism is inherently exploitative, and their promise that government redistribution will create fairness are all familiar themes in political history. The DSA frames its agenda as a moral correction to the greed of capitalism, but it is simply the latest iteration of a very old argument.

The DSA platform centers on expansive government control over economic life: free college, free healthcare, free housing, guaranteed income, elimination of private profit in essential industries, and heavy taxation of the wealthy to fund these programs. They argue that capitalism rewards greed, exploits workers, and concentrates wealth in the hands of a few. Their solution is political redistribution—taking from those who have succeeded and reallocating resources through government programs. It is a vision of society organized from the top down, guided by planners who claim to act on behalf of the working class.

But this narrative is not unique to the DSA. It

Jewish patients, physicians, health care staff and medical organizations are a target of a medical Jihad.  Christians are being targeted by this medical Jihad as well.

Since the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, there has been an alarming rise of Jew hatred in the field of health care. Medical professionals described this, in a briefing on Capitol Hill on December 17, 2024. Michelle Stravitz, CEO of the American Jewish Medical Association, said that Jew-hatred and anti-Israel bias pervade medical schools and professional medical associations. Eveline Shekhman, the CEO of The American Jewish Medical Association, testified that:

Jewish healthcare professionals are … being abandoned by the unions and administrations meant to protect them, and their patients are paying the price.

One way that patients are paying the price is by becoming so afraid of medical practitioners that they hide their Jewish identity or put off medical care.

In one case, medical practitioners found it necessary to hide a patient's identity.  Bondi Beach terror attack victim Rosalia Shikhverg was treated in an Australian hospital.  She was struck in the head by shrapnel and began bleeding heavily before she was admitted to Liverpool Hospital under her real name, with her surname and Jewish

While Germany's debt spiral is accelerating ever faster, Argentine President Javier Milei is steering his country in the opposite direction. Germany's statists will soon be left looking foolish once it becomes obvious that the German model has failed.

Only contrast reveals one's own mistakes. Javier Milei is the antithesis of Germany's political class, and the comparison could hardly be starker. While Germany continues to expand the state, Argentina is slashing subsidies and radically reducing the size of its public bureaucracy. While Berlin piles up enormous amounts of public debt, Buenos Aires is posting a primary budget surplus. Friedrich Merz believes in the healing powers of state intervention, whereas Milei is deregulating markets and paving the way for an investment boom.

Argentina has achieved an economic turnaround while Germany continues its economic decay. Argentina's economy is growing steadily, private-sector employment is expanding, and the poverty rate is falling rapidly.

At a time when Germany is doubling down on debt, the arms industry, and green state planning, Milei appears like a comet defying both political gravity and conventional doctrines of government.

The Argentine president's latest initiative is the so-called "Grillete Fiscal" -- literally, the "Fiscal Shackles."

Behind the martial name lies what amounts to a fiscal

I have long wondered if those who lived in pre-Revolutionary America knew somehow that they were living in capital-R Revolutionary times.  What were they feeling in 1765, 1770, 1775?  Did they know somehow, on some level, that a can't-turn-back tipping point was near?  The troubles were certainly ongoing.  It's not like they just woke up one day and wrote the Declaration to piss off King George.  It had been building for quite a while, in very real and very lethal ways.

Are we in those times right now?  And would we even know it if we were?  Heaven knows our troubles have been brewing for a while.  It's almost daily that we are greeted with confirmation of corruption we pieced together years ago, but are only now getting official paperwork on.  It's as if the machinery of power is belching it out, too full for the table.

I thought it might be instructive to review just some of the treachery we've endured that's gone unanswered.  Mind you, this is just a partial list but it certainly reads like a "pre-Revolutionary" list to me.

2011:  We learned about the ATF "gun walking" scandal Fast and Furious, when Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

If the Trojan War were being fought today, the Greeks would not need to hide inside of a big, wooden horse and hope to be dragged inside Troy's city gates.  They'd simply disseminate all kinds of lies on social media and wait for the Trojan people to fight each other.  Such is the power of corrosive ideas: They can destroy a civilization before its defenders understand that they are under attack.

Information warfare is the name of the game today.  It exists all around us.  Soundbites attack us from every phone, computer, tablet, and television screen.  Succinct messages ripple through social media platforms until people from opposite sides of the world repeat the same words without knowing why.  

The most powerful bits of information are the ones that sound unquestionably true.  "Believe all women."  "Black lives matter."  "Build back better."  Their simplicity assists their deception.  We certainly shouldn't distrust women, right?  Who wants to argue that black lives mean nothing?  Surely nobody wishes to build something worse than it was before.  People hear the soundbites, nod their heads, and repeat those words to their friends and neighbors.  Some place signs in their yards with those three-word messages, as if they were brilliant expositions of fundamental truths.

Successful information warfare propagates ideas without triggering in those who