All Section

Sun, Aug 9, 2026

R - U

Detroit Police Officers Punished For Cooperating With Border Patrol. ICE Tells Them To Apply For Jobs.

Detroit Police Officers Punished For Cooperating With Border Patrol. ICE Tells Them To Apply For Jobs.
Joseph Weiser/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Two officers with the Detroit Police Department were suspended without pay for 30 days on Thursday for calling Customs and Border Protection agents on two separate occasions that resulted in the agents taking suspects into federal custody.

A Detroit Police sergeant and officer were accused by Detroit Police Chief Todd Bettison of breaking department policy when they called Border Patrol agents during traffic stops on December 16 and February 9, ABC’s Detroit affiliate WXYZ reported. Bettison pushed to fire the officers, but the Board of Police Commissioners voted on Thursday to suspend the cops without pay. The officers were initially suspended with pay on February 12.

While Detroit has not officially declared itself a “sanctuary city” for illegal immigrants, it effectively acts as on as the police are prohibited from cooperating with federal immigration agents. During the incident earlier this month, Detroit Police sergeant Denise Wallet was called to assist an officer who was dealing with a person who could not speak English. According to Chief Bettison, the sergeant called Border Patrol to help with translation services instead of using the police department’s translation service line.

Wallet, who has been with the department for 27 years, sued the city after she was suspended. In a complaint, Wallet said that she contacted Border Patrol simply to identify the suspect, “not to enforce immigration law or to inquire into the subject’s immigration status,” Michigan Advance reported. Wallet’s action was discovered by the police department during a bodycam audit, which showed the sergeant make “a verbal comment expressing her disagreement with the DPD policy regarding immigration and collaboration with the federal government.”

In the complaint, Wallet argues that the police department’s policy violates federal law, which states that “no state or local government entity or official may prohibit or restrict any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, federal immigration authorities information regarding the citizenship or immigration status of any individual.” Wallet also argues that her due process rights were violated since she was suspended without being given an opportunity to defend herself.

Leftist Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib praised Chief Bettison for punishing the police officers.

“Chief Bettison and I agree that we need to make sure that our community and our residents trust the people who are trying to keep us safe,” Tlaib said.

Michigan House Republican leader Matt Hall, however, said that the Detroit Police Department’s action could prompt the state House to review the department’s policies, saying that firing the officers would be “unacceptable,” The Detroit News reported.

After the board voted on Thursday to suspend the officers without pay, Bettison said he would no longer pursue firing the officers.

“This incident should make it clear, however, that as Chief, I will continue to vigorously enforce DPD’s policies,” he added.

While Detroit has not seen the same surge in federal immigration operations that cities like Minneapolis and Chicago have experienced, ICE agents routinely arrest suspected illegal immigrants in the Motor City and surrounding area.

U.S. Stocks Close Up After SCOTUS Tariff Ruling Causes Wild Day For Markets

U.S. Stocks Close Up After SCOTUS Tariff Ruling Causes Wild Day For Markets
Sarayut Thaneerat/GettyImages

The United States Stock Market ended the day in the green after a volatile session driven by tariff news. The Supreme Court released its ruling at 10am, prompting the NASDAQ,the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the S&P 500 to rally after earlier declines based on weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter GDP data. After the initial rally, all three major indices retreated by midday before climbing again around 12:30pm, ultimately closing in the green for the day and the week. 

President Donald Trump hosted a midday press conference, where he noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling removes uncertainty surrounding tariffs. “The bottom line is that the word certainty is now in the equation,” Trump said.

Under the sweeping tariffs Trump issued using the International Emergency Economist Powers Act (IEEPA), the administration asserted that it had broad authority to impose duties with little notice, Trump could essentially issue a new tariff via Truth Social post. With his powers revoked, he will have to implement tariffs through Section 232s. Imposing tariffs through Section 232s is a much more bureaucratic process than under IEEPA.

To start the process, the Commerce Department will open a 90-270 day investigation on a product or class of imports. Once the investigation concludes, the Commerce Department will deliver the findings to the President and the President can then impose tariffs. The extended timeline provides companies with advance notice before duties are placed on imports, adding predictability for impacted companies. 

“The Supreme Court’s announcement regarding tariffs provides much-needed certainty for U.S. businesses and manufactures, enabling global supply chains to operate without ambiguity,” the National Retail Federation said after the ruling. “Clear and consistent trade policy is essential for economic growth, creating jobs and opportunities for American families. 

The retail sector was one of the strongest-performing sectors with certainty priced in around tariffs.  Amazon, Home Depot, Walmart, Target, and Five Below popped on the news. 

The next question for these retailers will be if refunds are issued levies they may have already paid. The Supreme Court did not issue a ruling on refunds so the decision will be litigated in lower courts.

WATCH: Liberal ‘Priestess’ Gives Viral Sermon On Abortion

WATCH: Liberal ‘Priestess’ Gives Viral Sermon On Abortion
Credit: OilLondonTV/X.com

The following is an edited transcript excerpt from The Michael Knowles Show.

* * *

A woman who presents herself as a “priestess” — a role that does not exist in Christianity — just went viral. This priestess puts on a collar and a stole and pretends to be a priest. And to make the whole presentation even more satanic, she includes the Planned Parenthood logo on the priestly stole.

Here is her defense of the Left’s highest sacrament, abortion:

Credit: @_BuzzBrief_X.com & @OilLondonTV/X.com

In the abortion imaginary, all people of faith are against abortion. This imaginary has colonized our minds, traumatizing many people with its toxic theology and shaping a culture of stigma and shame that has silenced millions of women and people who have had abortions, erasing their voices, their stories, and their witness from the public sphere. As a child of God, I can certainly appreciate the lyrical beauty of this text, as well as the descriptions in Jeremiah and Job of their certain knowledge that God was with them in the womb. I too feel that I am known by God in these ways. As a woman who has borne two children, I can affirm that I felt something sacred happening in my gestating body during those pregnancies. I can also attest that I felt God’s presence with me as I made the decision to end two pregnancies, and I felt no guilt, no shame, no sin.

Okay, this is horrifying. 

But you have to give this murderous woman, this truly sacrilegious heretic, some credit for honesty. She is openly acknowledging something that most pro-abortion Christians will not: something sacred was going on in my womb when that baby was being knit there. 

She goes on to basically say, Jeremiah and Job describe being knit in the womb. And yeah, that’s all real. I totally grant that. And I felt it. I personally know it’s real — but I chose to kill my kids and I felt that that was cool too.

So, of course, the difference between real Christianity and a lot of pagan cults is that Christianity is a definitive religion. Our Lord is a real person who lives in real time and space and picks real people to build his Church with and upon, like Saint Peter, to whom he gave the keys to the kingdom of heaven and the power to bind and to loose. It is a religion that has real, visible authority in the world throughout history.

During that history, our Lord says, I will send the helper, I will send the Holy Spirit to you, and I will be with you always, even until the end of the age, because our Lord is the bridegroom and the Church is the bride. It is a real, definitive religion.

We can definitively say Christianity outlaws abortion.

We can definitively say Christianity has a real view of marriage, and it doesn’t change.

We can really say all of that.

And this woman kind of admits that, which is why you have to give her points for honesty. She says there was a divine thing happening when babies were being created in her womb. But she killed them anyway because her autonomy trumped even the spark of the divine. In other words, her autonomy trumps even God himself.

WATCH: The Michael Knowles Show on DailyWire+

And it’s nuts when you hear it that way from a forthright liberal woman. But that is the premise of liberalism today — nothing is more important than my autonomy. I will make of myself the highest god.

We saw this in the Biden administration. Joe Biden believed he could be a liberal and a Christian, he was happy to do it. He called himself the most devout Catholic in the world. However, when his liberalism conflicted with his Christianity, he always chose liberalism.

And this is what liberalism tells us to do. We can believe a wide number of things. We can engage in a wide number of behaviors. We can even join many political parties. But the highest good is my autonomy. I’m really number one. I will make a god of myself. It’s a fulfillment of what the serpent promises to our first ancestors in the garden: “You will be like gods.”

You don’t have to listen to him.

And that’s what this woman is saying. It’s all the more shocking because she admits: Jeremiah and Job talk about the divine spark in the womb. I felt it too — and I killed them.

Press them on that.

Press the Democrats and the liberals on that: If you’re a Christian, what happens when Christianity contradicts your liberalism? Which side do you pick?

Trump Seeks Tougher Work Permit Rules For Illegals With Asylum Claims

Trump Seeks Tougher Work Permit Rules For Illegals With Asylum Claims
(Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

The Trump administration is proposing new regulations that would make it more difficult for illegal immigrants to receive work permits.

Under the Biden administration, as millions of illegal immigrants poured across the southern border, they were afforded the opportunity to receive work permits rapidly before even receiving immigration status. The new proposed rule would make it more difficult for illegal border crossers whose asylum claims have no standing to obtain work permits.

“For too long, a fraudulent asylum claim has been an easy path to working in the United States, overwhelming our immigration system with meritless applications,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said.

“We are proposing an overhaul of the asylum system to enforce the rules and reduce the backlog we inherited from the prior administration. Aliens are not entitled to work while we process their asylum applications. The Trump administration is strengthening the vetting of asylum applicants and restoring integrity to the asylum and work authorization processes,” the spokesperson added.

The plan would include a pause on the issuance of work permits for asylum seekers until they’re able to process applications within 180 days, according to the Friday notice.

It could take between 14 and 173 years to reach that benchmark, according to Reuters.

Once the rule is imposed, new illegal border crossers will be ineligible for work permits, according to the plan. Illegal immigrants who notify federal immigration authorities within 48 hours of crossing the border for fear of returning to their home country based on “persecution or torture” will be exempt from the rule.

“USCIS [United States Citizenship and Immigration Services] expects this rule to support another downward trend in the long term, but USCIS also expects that, upon implementation of this rule, new EAD [Employment Authorization Document] applications for pending asylum applicants would be paused for an extended period, possibly many years,” the notice read.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services currently has more than 1.4 million pending asylum claims on its plate, the agency said.

Work permits for asylum applicants are not considered “an entitlement,” according to the Department of Homeland Security, which “believes that this rule is key to disincentivizing aliens from using asylum primarily as a path to seek employment authorization in the United States and to ensuring more timely processing of asylum applications.”

The Trump administration will accept public comment for 60 days before attempting to move forward with the plan.

Some illegal immigrants who previously received work permits used them to obtain commercial driver’s licenses. While behind the wheel of heavy trucks, some of them caused fatal accidents.

Chinese illegal immigrant Yisong Huang, 54, is accused of killing a 31-year-old truck driver and injuring several others in Tennessee on Dec. 9 while he was distracted by a video on his phone as he drove a tour bus.

Huang crossed the border illegally in 2023 and was swiftly released into the country. He was later granted a work permit and Social Security card.

On Wednesday, an Indian illegal immigrant, Singh Sukhdeep, behind the wheel of a semi-truck allegedly caused an accident that killed 64-year-old Terry Schultz in Hendricks County, Indiana.

Singh crossed the border illegally in 2018 and was released into the country because he was a minor at the time, federal law enforcement sources told The Daily Wire.

The illegal immigrant had a valid work permit at the time of the crash. The Indian national also had an Indiana commercial driver’s license, according to Fox News.

Alysa Liu’s Father Escaped China. She Just Won Olympic Gold For The United States.

Alysa Liu’s Father Escaped China. She Just Won Olympic Gold For The United States.
(Photo by Ulrik Pedersen/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Team USA women’s figure skater Alysa Liu defied the odds to become the first American woman to win Olympic gold in twenty years. As the California native took to the Olympic podium before the entire world, her breathtaking comeback was also paved by her father’s patriotic story of grit and heroism against seemingly greater odds. 

After ranking third in the women’s short program on Tuesday, Liu — cool, calm, and collected as usual — showed up to the rink smiling, waving to the crowd, and ready to skate. She performed her routine to Donna Summer’s “MacArthur Park Suite” with the infectious energy that is a trademark of the 20-year-old. After the near-perfect skate earned her a career-best 226.79 points, she was placed in first with just two skaters left — Japan’s three-time World Champion Kaori Sakamoto and Ami Nakai.

When both skaters just slightly missed the mark —Sakamoto scored 224.90 points and Ami five points behind her — Liu officially captured the gold medal and a much-needed win for Team USA.

What separates Liu from the rest of her team — and brings extra sweetness to her win — is the fact that she actually walked away from the sport for more than two years.

When Liu was thirteen, she became the youngest national champion, only to win again the following year. The teen prodigy dominated the sport, fueling hope for her family to become the next Michelle Kwan. In 2019, she even became the first American female to complete a quadruple jump in an international competition. But all that changed after the 2022 Beijing Olympics, when at age 16, Liu announced in an Instagram post that she was retiring from the sport, “… i feel so satisfied with how my skating career has gone. now that i’m finally done with my goals in skating i’m going to be moving on with my life.” 

In hopes of living a “normal” life, Liu used her freedom from the ice to hang out with friends, visit Nepal, hike to Everest Base Camp, and go on road trips. That was, until a skiing trip with her family ignited an old spark — and the desire to compete again.

Liu emerged from the two-year break in 2024, punctuating her comeback with a first-place win at the World Championships the following year. It is almost unheard of to return to the sport after so much time away. But Liu proved she was just that good.

Liu isn’t just a talented athlete. She carries with her the precious roots of what it means to be American, and having to fight for it.

Arthur Liu, her father, was born and raised in China. He was a university student during the infamous 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, where student-led protests and demonstrations turned deadly, and hundreds, if not thousands, were arrested, killed, or went missing in the brutal government crackdown. Liu said he was “outraged” by the massacre and went on to organize more protests. After learning he was on the government’s “most wanted” list, he worried future imprisonment was inevitable. At age 25, he fled from China to Hong Kong and eventually made his way to America.

Three months before his daughter was supposed to represent the United States in the Beijing Olympics, a man who claimed to be a U.S. Official called Liu, asking for passport information. “I felt something fishy was going on,” he told the Associated Press at the time. “I’m not going to let them stop her from going and I’ll do whatever I can to make sure she’s safe and I’m willing to make sacrifices so she can enjoy the moment. I’m not going to let them win — to stop me — to silence me from expressing my opinions anywhere.”

Prosecutors alleged that the family was a target of a Chinese spying operation, and that the man was hired to perform surveillance on them.

But foreign harassment didn’t stop the teenager, and Liu still made her Olympic debut that year — just with heightened security from the State Department.

True to her light-hearted nature, Liu called the experience “a little bit freaky and exciting,” and wondered what her life would look like as a movie. “They got to make me look like a super cool hero or something. I can’t just be the kid that got spied on and did nothing about it.”

“I would just have the main focus be my dad’s story, because his story is so cool … everything that only happened because of what he did, so, I feel like we got to start with the roots.”

SCOTUS Knocks Down Trump’s Tariffs

SCOTUS Knocks Down Trump’s Tariffs
Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images

The Supreme Court has struck down the Liberation Day tariffs.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court basically struck down the 10% baseline tariff on all trading partners. It struck down what Trump called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries. They weren’t actually reciprocal tariffs because those countries were not actually charging us those tariffs. We were just charging them higher tariffs on the basis of trade deficits. Drug trafficking tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China are gone. And the 145% effective rate on most Chinese goods is gone as well. 

The Supreme Court says that the president does not have the unilateral authority or ability to simply impose broad-scale tariffs. 

The reason I originally said these tariffs were unconstitutional is because Article I “powers of the purse,” belong to Congress. That includes the power to tariff. Article I of the Constitution specifically names the powers of the purse. It says that the Constitution includes the authority to tax, borrow money, regulate commerce, coin money, establish post offices, declare war, and raise armed forces. That is what is in the tax, spend, and commerce powers of Congress.

Now the questions are, what can be delegated? What can’t be delegated? And what has been delegated? 

So obviously, in certain specified contexts, Congress has delegated specific tariff authority to the president. But at any point, did Congress just say to the president, you can tariff anybody for any reason, interminably at any rate, that you want?

And the answer, says the Supreme Court, is no.

I agree with the decision, legally.

DailyWire+

The question under consideration here was whether the president of the United States has the unilateral authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which is the power cited by the president of the United States, to levy tariffs on the entire world at once. That is the question at issue. 

The IEEPA text at issue states: 

At the times and to the extent specified in section 1701 of this title, the President may, under such regulations as he may prescribe, by means of instructions, licenses, or otherwise investigate, regulate, or prohibit any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit or payments between, by, through, or to any banking institution, to the extent that such transfers or payments involve any interest of any foreign country or a national thereof, the importing or exporting of currency or securities, by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

What the majority found is that IEEPA does not include broad-scale, unilateral, gigantic tariff power where the president cannot simply wake up one morning, print out a gigantic poster board, and say there is now a 45% tariff on the Solomon Islands that was not delegated in the IEEPA. 

That decision is correct, although I find it somewhat ironic that Justice Roberts claimed that Obamacare was not a tax for purposes of finding it constitutional, but finds that tariffs are in fact a form of tax for purposes of finding them unconstitutional, as promoted by the president. 

There are two arguments made by the majority opinion. One, the IEEPA does not actually authorize tariff power to the president in the way that the president has done. 

This doesn’t mean the president doesn’t have alternative tariff power. There are other ways the president can impose tariffs if he wants to.

The second argument is that Congress never delegated this power to the president. If they had, it would be clear, and not some mystery. They would say, “All tariff power belongs to the president.”

They wouldn’t hide it in the text. That is what’s called the major questions doctrine. It’s part of the non-delegation doctrine. The non-delegation doctrine says that unless Congress has delegated a power that it holds to the executive branch, then the executive branch can’t exercise that power. And there are certain powers that Congress cannot actually just delegate to the executive branch, because those are core powers of Congress.

This is why you can’t just have Congress become a vestigial organ. It was never supposed to be this way.

If the president actually had the inherent power under his foreign policy powers to just impose tariffs, he wouldn’t need some sort of emergency declaration. The fact that they use the emergency declaration means this is not predominantly a foreign policy question.

I urge conservatives to think about this very strongly: If the president of the United States can simply declare a national emergency and then tariff the entire planet, what can’t the federal government do on the basis of an emergency? Many statutes authorize specific delegations of temporary authority under emergency circumstances. If that is broadened out to include things such as tariffing the whole planet, imagine Democrats saying, “Until all countries stop producing oil-powered vehicles, we are tariffing everyone at 70%.” They could do that based on the way the administration is currently interpreting the statute.

If it becomes clear that the Trump administration will let go of this issue, I think you will see the markets begin to climb. There are a lot of businesses in the United States that rely on foreign imports as inputs in their products, and they’ve been holding off on hiring; they’ve been holding off on development because they don’t know what’s coming down the pike.

I am still a constitutional conservative who likes the balance of powers, the checks and balances, who still remembers when the legislature was not a vestigial organ of government, and would like that to remain the case.

For conservatives, I understand: People love President Trump. I support President Trump as a general rule.

With that said, powers delegated to the executive branch do not flow back to the legislative branch very often. You’re not going to like those limits when they are applied to a president of a party to which you do not belong.

I’m finding it kind of ironic today, looking at all the Democrats who are celebrating this as a big victory. They wouldn’t be celebrating this if they understood it’s going to apply when a Democrat is in charge.

No one has expanded executive power in my lifetime like Barack Obama. And Joe Biden expanded it even further.

The notion that Democrats are not in love with executive power is insane to me.

It’s one of the reasons I don’t like the Democratic Party, because they keep wanting to expand the executive power at the cost of the checks and balances established by the Founders.

Illegal Alien Convicted Of Sex Crime Against Teen Entered U.S. Under Biden

Illegal Alien Convicted Of Sex Crime Against Teen Entered U.S. Under Biden
Credit: DHS; Biden: Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested a 28-year-old illegal alien woman convicted of sex crimes against a teenage boy on Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security told The Daily Wire.

ICE agents nabbed Michelle Rodriguez-Berrio, an illegal alien from Colombia, convicted in Utah for sexual contact with a 16- or 17-year-old boy. Rodriguez-Berrio was let into the country under former President Joe Biden in 2022, a DHS spokesman told The Daily Wire.

“In February 2022, this sexual predator alien illegally entered the U.S. and was encountered by Border Patrol. She was released into the U.S. by the Biden administration,” the spokesman said. “On January 26, 2026, Rodriguez was convicted by the Salt Lake City County District Court for the offense of Unlawful Sexual Conduct with a 16- or 17-year-old. Thanks to ICE, she is now off American streets and will remain in custody pending removal.”

Rodriguez-Berrio was one of the “worst of the worst” illegal alien offenders detained by ICE agents on Thursday. Others highlighted by DHS to The Daily Wire included:

-Rene Lopez-Balbuena, an illegal alien from Mexico convicted of endangering the welfare of a child and sexual assault of a child in Monmouth County, New Jersey.

-Luis Elias-Santos, an illegal alien from Mexico convicted of second-degree statutory rape in Boone County, Missouri.

-Jeovanny Porras-Rodriguez, an illegal alien from Mexico convicted of trafficking in meth in Buncombe County, North Carolina.

-Leonardo Garcia-Meza, an illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in Collin County, Texas.

Elias-Santos/Porras-Rodriguez: DHS.

“Even while facing doxing, threats, harassment and a more than 1,300% increase in assaults against them, ICE continues to go after criminal illegal aliens, including pedophiles, violent sex criminals and drug traffickers,” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told The Daily Wire. “Nearly 70% of all ICE arrests are of illegal aliens convicted or charged of a crime in the U.S. If you break the law, you will face the consequences. Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the U.S.”

Millions of illegal aliens were released into the United States during the Biden administration, many of whom went on to commit crimes, including Jose Antonio Ibarra, the Venezuelan national who murdered 22-year-old nursing student Laken Riley.

Liberal County Took On Religious Parents — Now They’re Paying For It

Liberal County Took On Religious Parents — Now They’re Paying For It
Credit: Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images.

A liberal Maryland county will shell out $1.5 million to a group of religious parents who sued the school board over a policy that blocked parents from opting their children out of instruction on books pushing transgender ideology.  

In addition to paying damages, the board of education for Montgomery County must inform parents whenever there will be instruction related to family life and human sexuality. The settlement comes after a group of parents from various religious backgrounds won a major victory at the Supreme Court that struck down the county’s opt-out policies as unconstitutional. 

The settlement was announced on Friday by Becket, a non-profit law firm focused on litigation issues related to religious liberty. It was approved by Judge Deborah Boardman in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. 

“Public schools nationwide are on notice: running roughshod over parental rights and religious freedom isn’t just illegal — it’s costly,” said Eric Baxter, senior counsel at Becket and lead attorney for the parents. “This settlement enforces the Supreme Court’s ruling and ensures parents, not government bureaucrats, have the final say in how their children are raised.” 

Montgomery County is a heavily Democratic area that borders Washington, D.C. 

In June 2025, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the parents against the county, with Justice Samuel Alito writing the majority opinion. 

“A government burdens the religious exercise of parents when it requires them to submit their children to instruction that poses ‘a very real threat of undermining’ the religious beliefs and practices that the parents wish to instill,” Alito wrote.

The legal battle first began in March 2023, when the school board said that it would no longer let parents opt out of books pushing transgender and queer ideology. In response, a group of Christian, Muslim, and Jewish parents challenged the county in Mahmoud v. Taylor.

“It took tremendous courage for these parents to stand up to the School Board and take their case all the way to the Supreme Court,” Baxter said. “Their victory reshaped the law and ensured that generations of religious parents will be able to guide their children’s upbringing according to their faith.”

Chris Persak, a Catholic father whose children attend Montgomery County schools, previously told The Daily Wire it was his faith that helped him stay calm throughout the whole legal process. 

“We said prayers of the Holy Spirit, and just felt this unbelievable calmness as we’re walking in,” he said. “Even with the protesters, even with members of the leadership of Montgomery County, who were protesting against us live that day.”

SHOCKER: Company That Sells ‘Plant-Based Meat’ Is In A Stock Freefall

SHOCKER: Company That Sells ‘Plant-Based Meat’ Is In A Stock Freefall
Illustrated by The Daily Wire

NOTE: Jeremy’s Razors pays to write these articles to spotlight wins because other brands won’t.

The market has spoken, most Americans still want meat — real meat, like steaks, burgers, and tenderloins, not the plant-based alternatives sold by companies such as Beyond Meat.

Beyond Meat, which launched in the United States 2012, had a promising start. with its stock reaching nearly $150 per share as recently as 2021. But since then, Beyond Meat’s stock price has gone beyond terrible.

So what exactly does Beyond Meat sell? Any type of meat you could want, except none of it is actually meat. Its burgers are a mixture of vegan ingredients, including pea protein, rice protein, and potato starch.

And Beyond Meat sells “steak” too — only it’s made from wheat gluten, canola oil, faba bean protein, among some other ingredients. The market has spoken, and it decided against a processed echo of America’s beloved beef.

Beyond Meat might be good for people who want some unorthodox substitute for burgers, but most Americans want the real thing. Remember when powerful leftists like Bill Gates assured us that it would be good for the world if we stopped eating real meat and transitioned to consuming lab-grown alternatives? Or when globalist NGOs argued that eating bugs is totally normal and would save the planet? Well, if they can’t take the hint — freedom-loving Americans aren’t going to give up their juicy steak.

***

Whether it’s the meat you eat or the products you use, Jeremy’s Razors knows you want the real deal. That’s why we’re committed to serving our customers with what they want — the ability to consume without compromising on values. Every dollar you spend at Jeremy’s Razors is one less dollar in the pockets of woke CEOs who only care about your money. We give you choices worthy of your business by creating true alternatives in the market.

For a limited time, every razor order comes with Jeremy’s 2oz American-made Shave Cream for FREE while supplies last. No catch. No coupon code necessary. Just order a Precision 5 starter set or value bundle to try a travel-friendly size of Jeremy’s Shave Cream with Green Tea & Menthol. Natural ingredients that soften your whiskers, protect your skin, and make that blade glide—and not just because it isn’t weighed down by trying to be something it’s not. Free from sulfates, parabens, and phthalates. Formulated for men who don’t back down.

Gavin Newsom’s Bungled High-Speed Rail Project Includes Zero Trains

Gavin Newsom’s Bungled High-Speed Rail Project Includes Zero Trains

Speaking in his "state of the state" address, Gavin Newsom declares that California is laying tracks high-speed rail.
Image CreditKCRA 3 / YouTube

A quite pleasant piece of reporting from Julie Watts at CBS News adds a new wrinkle to a thing The Federalist has been saying for a while: California's high-speed rail project is a political symbol plus a union giveaway, and no operational train system is coming anytime in the foreseeable future.

Senate Committee Holds Fauci In Contempt For Refusing To Answer For Covid Lies

Senate Committee Holds Fauci In Contempt For Refusing To Answer For Covid Lies

A Senate committee voted to hold former White House Covid czar Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress on Thursday following his refusal to answer for his Covid lies and conduct throughout the lockdown period.

"Holding a witness in contempt is a serious thing, and it should be rare," Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chair Rand Paul, R-Ky., said at the hearing. "But the contempt power exists for precisely this circumstance."

Image