A new report has uncovered that major AI hubs, including ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, are trained to promote pro-vaccination propaganda, delivering biased outputs that align with the interests of the Vaccine Industrial Complex.

The report highlights concerns that these AI platforms, comparable to Google in their limitations, may have been used by Deep State bureaucrats to produce the flawed allopathic MAHA report, which contained false research, fake sources, and fabricated citations. This raises questions about the integrity of AI-generated information and its role in advancing specific agendas.

Naturalnews.com reports: The VIC is too big, too powerful, and too entrenched in their depopulation agenda. Vaccines are the number one genocide tool and always have been, especially since the fake Polio jab was invented, and now that the mRNA clot shots are leading the charge with myocarditis, pericarditis, vascular clots, spontaneous abortions, SIDS, SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome) and “all-cause mortality.”

The MAHA Report faces scrutiny over AI-generated content and fabricated sources, undermining its validity and sparking debates about AI’s role in official documents

Trump is finding out that even with a mostly legitimate cabinet (non-Deep-State), he still can’t get much done, thanks to rogue Leftist judges, Deep State actors entrenched in the 3-letter agencies, and the powers that be that will always rule Big Pharma, Biotech, Big Food and the Vaccine Industrial Complex, most of all.

Too many sheeple believe whole-heartedly in getting jabbed up with known neurotoxins to quell their fear of infectious diseases, which has been catapulted by the fake news media and hucksters like Fauci and Bill Gates.

A controversial public health report commissioned by U.S. health authorities is under fire after experts alleged it was generated using artificial intelligence, raising concerns about fabricated citations and unreliable data. The MAHA Commission Report, intended to guide vaccine policy, has been criticized for including references to non-existent authors and sources, with critics pointing to footnote tags linked to OpenAI tools as evidence of AI involvement.

The report’s credibility has been further undermined by multiple revisions from the White House, which removed false references after its initial release. Public health leaders, including Georges C. Benjamin of the American Public Health Association, have called for the document to be scrapped, arguing that AI-generated inaccuracies render it unfit for policymaking.

This incident highlights a growing issue with AI “hallucinations” — instances where chatbots invent false information — prompting demands for stricter oversight of AI-generated content in official documents. Critics warn that reliance on unverified AI tools risks embedding misinformation in government reports, particularly in sensitive areas like public health.

The controversy echoes past debates over institutional trust, particularly following high-profile cases of flawed research influencing policy, such as the retracted Lancet study linking vaccines to autism. Skepticism toward pharmaceutical influence has also intensified since the COVID-19 pandemic, with critics alleging conflicts of interest among regulators and industry stakeholders.

The MAHA report’s alleged AI origins add fuel to these concerns, as opponents argue that automated systems could amplify bias or manipulation in policymaking. While proponents view AI as a tool for efficiency, this case underscores the need for transparency and verification in its use — especially when public health decisions are at stake.

The debate extends beyond vaccines, touching on fears that AI could be weaponized to control narratives, particularly in news and public discourse. Quotes like, “It’s our job to tell you what to think” — have resurfaced in discussions about AI’s potential to curate or censor information.

As lawmakers grapple with AI regulation, the MAHA report serves as a cautionary tale: without safeguards, automated systems risk eroding trust in institutions already under scrutiny.