In late 2020, with much of the world under lockdown or facing draconian restrictions on movement, the development of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 was widely portrayed as a medical miracle. Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna rolled out the experimental shots at unprecedented speed, promising to save millions of lives. But now a growing number of voices – scientists, doctors, and ordinary observers alike – are raising new concerns about the technology’s safety. From lipid nanoparticles to pseudouridine, some of the lesser-known ingredients in mRNA vaccines are coming under increased scrutiny.

When mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were first rolled out, much of the safety debate centered around the spike protein – the molecule our cells produce to trigger immunity. Critics pointed to research suggesting it could harm blood vessels or spark inflammation, potentially explaining side effects such as myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or clotting. But as concerns have evolved, the spotlight has widened.

While the spike protein remains a key worry – especially for its alleged role in myocarditis – today’s critics are digging deeper, questioning the long-term safety of the entire mRNA-based approach.

The Lack of Long-Term Safety Data

At the heart of mRNA vaccines is a simple idea: deliver genetic instructions to our cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response. Unlike traditional vaccines, which use weakened viruses or proteins, mRNA vaccines rely on synthetic messenger RNA wrapped in tiny fat bubbles called lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). These LNPs act like delivery trucks, carrying the mRNA into our cells. It’s clever stuff, but evidence suggests the approach might not be as safe as we’ve been told.

One major concern is the LNPs themselves. These fatty shells are crucial for protecting mRNA from breaking down and getting it into our cells, but they’re not without issues. Early versions of LNPs were found to be toxic, causing inflammation and even damaging cell membranes. While newer designs, like those used in COVID-19 vaccines, are supposed to be safer, some researchers argue they can still trigger immune reactions or build up in organs like the liver, raising questions about long-term effects.

Another ingredient raising concern is pseudouridine, a modified nucleoside molecule added to mRNA to make it more stable and less likely to trigger an immune attack. This tweak was key to making vaccines like Pfizer’s and Moderna’s work, supposedly boosting their efficacy to over 90 percent. But there’s a catch: pseudouridine might not be as harmless as it seems. Critics point to research showing that modified mRNA can still spark inflammation. The lack of long-term safety data in this area is fueling unease.

Perhaps the most troubling concern is ‘off-target delivery,’ where LNPs carry mRNA to the wrong places in the body. The liver is the primary destination for these nanoparticles, but research shows they can also end up in the spleen and lungs. This raises the possibility that mRNA could instruct cells in these organs to produce spike proteins, potentially triggering inflammation or other damage.

The World Deserves Honest Answers

These concerns aren’t just scientific nitpicks. They reflect a deeper issue: a lack of transparency and long-term scrutiny in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The speed of development was ultrarapid, leaving little time to study how the technologies involved might behave years down the line.

Far from being based on settled science, there remains much that we still don’t know about mRNA vaccines. Only rarely does the legacy media acknowledge this. The world deserves honest answers to these concerns, not just dismissive reassurances that everything is fine.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

This article was originally published on Dr. Rath Health Foundation.

Executive Director of the Dr. Rath Health Foundation and one of the coauthors of our explosive book, “The Nazi Roots of the ‘Brussels EU’”, Paul is also our expert on the Codex Alimentarius Commission and has had eye-witness experience, as an official observer delegate, at its meetings. You can find Paul on Twitter at @paulanthtaylor

He is a regular contributor to Global Research. 

Featured image source

Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.

Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.

Source link