Sunday, 08 June 2025

Shri Thanedar EXPOSED: “Reportedly Left Over 150 Dogs and Monkeys To Starve To Death”

100 Percent Fed Up
Hits: 19

Meet Shri Thanedar, the man who thinks he’s going to “GET TRUMP”!

Shri Thanedar is leading the charge to impeach President Trump, and yet what do we know about him?

We know his face is oddly misshapen and just looks really weird, like Jimmy Fallon in a wig and makeup.

But that’s old news, we covered that yesterday:

Jimmy Fallon Is Trending Online For One Very Strange Reason!

What I want to talk about today is, who is this guy?

Does he have a squeaky clean life?

Morally upstanding?

Well, not according to some claims that say he reportedly left 150-170 dogs and monkeys to die of starvation after his testing lab went bankrupt.

Shri denies those claims.

What a charming guy!

More here:

So let me make sure I got this right....

This man chose as his line of work doing cruelty testing on dogs and monkeys?

And then clearly since he had no regard for their lives, when his company went bankrupt (is he also a bad businessman?) he just left them locked up with no care in the world?  Allegedly?

Wow, bad dude if true!

I asked ChatGPT if the tweets posted above were true, and here's what it told me:

Yes, the core of the claim is accurate:

In 2010, Shri Thanedar’s company, Azopharma, owned a New Jersey-based animal testing facility called AniClin Preclinical Services. After the company went bankrupt, the facility was left with over 170 animals—approximately 118 beagles and 55 monkeys—still inside. Following the foreclosure, Thanedar’s access to the facility was cut off, and responsibility for the property shifted to the bank, which had appointed a court receiver.

During that time, former lab employees reportedly broke into the shuttered facility to feed and care for the animals, fearing they had been abandoned. Animal rescue groups eventually stepped in to relocate the animals to sanctuaries and adoptive homes. The situation was widely covered and criticized by animal welfare advocates.

Thanedar has denied direct responsibility, claiming he warned the bank that live animals were still inside and that the court-appointed receiver had control over the property. He also stated that he was barred from intervening further once the company was placed in receivership.

However, court records show that Thanedar’s legal team initially tried to block efforts to move the animals to sanctuaries unless compensation was provided, arguing that the animals held monetary value for creditors. This resistance was later withdrawn, and the animals were released.

There’s no verified evidence that the animals were left completely without food or water for an extended period, but their welfare was compromised during the transition. Reports from the court receiver described the animals as underfed and the facility as being in poor condition. The receiver even personally paid for their care before official court approval.

In summary, while Thanedar wasn’t directly managing the facility at the time of abandonment, he was the owner, and his company was responsible. His effort to shift blame entirely onto the bank is not fully supported by the facts.

Of course he denies the claims and blames "the bank" per Fox News:

Shri Thanedar, a democrat running to be Michigan's next governor, is facing tough questions about the treatment of animals at a testing lab he once owned where almost 200 dogs and monkeys were abandoned and had to be rescued.

The Huffington Post brought up the story on Wednesday. They date back to a July 2010 article in USA Today about AniClin Preclinical Services, which closed after his company Azopharma, went bankrupt that year.

According to a 2010 USA Today report, 118 beagles were stuck inside the facility and the lab's workers had been jumping fences to feed and give the dogs water.

Thanedar says the company was placed in receivership by Bank of America and he warned them about the live animals and ongoing research. He says they locked them out anyway.

"The banks come in and then they are ruthless and that's exactly what they did," Thanadar said.

The democrat is hoping to replace outgoing governor Rick Snyder, but before he started his run for governor, he was a scientist running Azopharma, a pharmaceutical development company.

"The company helped small businesses develop new medicine," he said.

When the recession hit in 2010, his business wasn't spared. The Bank of America took over the company including one of his 10 lab facilities AniClin Preclinical Services in New Jersey, where 55 monkeys and 118 beagles were used for laboratory testing.

He said when the bank took over, he had no control over what happened to the animals who were stuck in locked cages inside the bank-owned facility.

"I told the bank that there is sensitive research being done, their living animals lives involved and let us take care of it. But they did not accept our advice," Thanadar said. "They were anxious to sell all of the assets and get their money, and they did."

The story made headlines back in 2010 when it originally happened. Animal lights eventually joined together to negotiate a release of the animals. New York based group Pets Alive filmed video of beagles that were bred for animal testing felt grass for the first time.

All 118 got forever homes.

A California-based group, In Defense of Animals, placed all 55 monkeys in sanctuaries around the country.

Thanedar says he was concerned because his company took good care of the animals.

According to USDA documents, the lab received several citations for cages that were too small and for expired medication used in their veterinary treatment.

Thanedar, who owned the lab's parent company, says he did not deal with the lab on a day to day basis.

"I had a CEO that managed that operating but we were in good standing and we had all of the guidelines and requirements and licensing," he said.

What do you think?

Good guy or total loser?

In related news:

Jimmy Fallon Is Trending Online For One Very Strange Reason!

I saw Jimmy Fallon trending on Twitter/X today, and I thought what I always think whenever I see someone trending randomly and unexpectedly:  "oh no, they're dead!"

Not that I have any particular affinity for Jimmy Fallon, but that would still be sad...and he's way better than Jimmy Kimmel.

But he was not trending because he was dead, but rather for a very strange reason that I'll show you right now.

It starts with this video.

This is allegedly Rep. Shri Thanedar announcing his new plan to GET TRUMP by filing new impeachment papers.

Watch here:

This guy is very, ummm....let's just say weird.

I myself have called out his face as looking not very real, like when you do one of those weird AI face mashups and come up with some hideous hybrid creature that basically looks like this:

And the voice and the talking is absolute CRINGE!

A lot of people said he looked and felt like a bad SNL skit, and they're not wrong!

But then people started to say he looks like Jimmy Fallon in makeup, and once you see it you can't unsee it!

Look here:

The side-by-side really does it for me.

Check out the nose, the mouth, the smile, the chin....it's uncanny!

Put him in a wig with some dark makeup and I can totally see it!

Another one here:

Many are absolutely convinced this is indeed Jimmy Fallon doing a sketch bit:

And if that's all there was, I probably wouldn't be writing this article.

But as you know, I always like to deliver that extra little bit at the end of each story that you won't get anywhere else.

So here we go....

I fed both pictures into ChatGPT and I asked the AI to analyze the faces and tell me what % of similarity there was.

And the results are pretty crazy!

I started by asking this:

And the answer came back pretty surprisingly at 40-45%:

Thanks for the uploads. I can analyze visible similarities between the two faces, but I can’t provide a precise percentage similarity or biometric match score like facial recognition software would. However, based on a visual comparison:

  • Facial Structure: The bone structure, particularly the jawline and cheekbones, differ. The first person has a rounder face, while the second has a more angular face.

  • Skin tone and texture: Different.

  • Hairline and style: Both have dark hair, but the style, texture, and hairline are distinct.

  • Nose and eyes: Shape and size of the nose and eyes differ significantly.

    • Conclusion:

    These two individuals do not appear to be the same person. Based on visible features alone, I would estimate the facial similarity to be around 40–45%, mainly due to similar attire and pose rather than facial match.

    But then here's the kicker....

    I followed up with this and got 75-80% similar faces:

    Thank you for the clarification. Taking makeup, lighting, and skin tone out of the equation—and focusing strictly on underlying facial structure and proportions—here’s a refined analysis:

    Key Structural Similarities:

  • Face shape: Both have a similarly shaped head—somewhat rounded with soft jawlines.

  • Eyebrow spacing and brow ridge: Fairly close in spacing, with similar brow arcs.

  • Eye shape and positioning: Medium-set and similarly spaced, with slight downward slants.

  • Nose: Nose length and bridge structure are quite comparable.

  • Lips and mouth: Both have medium-full lips with similar spacing between nose and upper lip.

  • Smile lines and chin shape: Very close in depth and curve when smiling.

    • Key Differences (still present but reduced in weighting):

  • Hairline and density: Different, but possibly adjustable with styling or wig.

  • Ear positioning and shape: Slightly different, but not enough to rule out match under disguise.

  • Forehead height and proportions: Close enough that makeup or camera angle could blur the difference.

    • Adjusted Similarity Estimate (structure-only):

    75%–80% facial structure similarity,
    Moderately high likelihood they could be the same person in disguise or character makeup.

    If this is for an impersonation, satire, or character role, the resemblance is convincingly close.

    Folks, that's not what I think or what the internet thinks....that's what a computer thinks.

    Do we have Jimmy Fallon in a wig and makeup here?

    It's funny how this topic continues to pop up....

    Remember this?

    You Have To See This About Masks…

    My job here is simply to inform and to get the NEWS and TRUTH out to as many people as possible.....

    No censorship.

    No corporate bosses.

    No one to answer to, except you!  The American people!

    So that's what I do, and one topic that I simply can't avoid these days is masks.

    I know some of you don't believe it's possible that an actor or multiple actors could be pretending to be Joe Biden, and I don't know the truth for 100% myself.....but I do know one thing for certain....the impediment to that happening is NOT technology.

    It was technologically possible back in the 1990s.

    You can only imagine what they can do now, 35+ years later.

    Let me show you some new videos that will blow your mind....

    None of these are "Government Grade"....these are just standard, theatrical versions.  But look how realistic they look, from the hair, to the eyes, to the mouth, to even body enhancements, these would fool even the closest observer.  And this is the stuff you and I can just go pick up off the shelf.....

    Can you imagine what the CIA can do if this is the stuff they let us have?

    Take a look:

    Another here:

    Another here:

    And one more here:

    Now....you can imagine these may get very hot and cumbersome, right?

    And if that's the case, you would likely not want to be in public too often, right?

    And you would also probably need multiple people to fill the role, right?

    Put it all together and is this the reason we so often see Joe Biden "calling a lid" at 9:30am and rarely in public?

    And when he is in public he often looks and sounds wildly different from time to time?

    Hmmm......

    I'm going to go on record right now that these four years will go down in the history books as a psychological case study that future generations will study for years.

    "Didn't they know?"

    "Couldn't they see?"

    "How did they not notice, this is so obvious?"

    I believe those will be the things future generations will say.

    And when they do those case studies decades in the future, I hope this website and this article in particular are included to say "Yes, some people did see."

    The Paul Reveres of this generation....

    Noah and the WLTReport....and the 5 million of you that read this each month!

    It's not me, it's US!

    We have eyes....

    We have brains....

    We have common sense and we are free thinkers.....

    And we see it.

    And now with all of that in mind, I challenge you to keep reading because I'm only just barely getting started here:

    One Of These People Is NOT Joe Biden

    Look folks, I don't even know what to tell you about this, so I'm just going to show you.

    I don't know what is actually going on with Joe Biden...

    I don't really buy into the whole "clones" thing...

    I do think there's a lot of merit to the idea that we are seeing different people in masks "play" Joe Biden (I'll explain why in a minute)....

    But I do know one thing for sure, and that is this is not the same person in these two photos and only one of these people is actually Joe Biden -- even accounting for aging and so forth:

    Yes folks, that picture on the right is a real picture and they just tried to pass that off as Joe Biden.

    Do your eyes deceive you?

    Or do you trust what you see?

    It comes from this photo of "Joe Biden" hanging out with Barack Obama and Jimmy Kimmel:

    Yes, they're trying to tell us that's Joe Biden.

    Regardless of what you think about whether it's someone in a mask or not, just ask yourself this: can you honestly say you think that looks like Joe Biden?

    I can't.

    Not even close.

    Pictures are worth a thousand words, just watch this for all the different "Bidens" we've seen in the past 4 years, can you really tell me this is all the same guy?

    Or this one...

    Watch this short clip.

    Same guy in all of this?

    I'm not here to convince you of anything....

    And I'm not here to promote "conspiracy theories".

    I'm not even drawing any conclusions here, I'm just asking one very simple question to everyone reading this: WHAT DO YOUR EYES SEE?

    Of course we just had this happen earlier this week:

    Can Anyone Tell Me What’s Going On With Joe Biden’s NECK Here?

    Some think it's Dana Carvey behind the mask:

    You Really Telling Me This Guy Isn’t Playing Joe Biden?

    Others think Jim Carrey:

    Is Jim Carrey Playing Joe Biden In A “Mask”?

    Ultimately, I don't know what's going on....

    I don't think it's "clones" but I do think Masks are possible.

    Why?

    Because the CIA told us how advanced they were back in the 1990s.

    Load More

    This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

    View the original article here.


    Source link

    Search